
The U.S. government is deciding whether to classify CFTC-regulated sports prediction contracts as gambling transactions subject to the new 90% loss deduction cap.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and U.S. Department of the Treasury are the only bodies that can issue the formal guidance required to resolve this classification.
Since tax year 2026, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" limits gambling loss deductions to 90% of losses, but no IRS ruling explicitly names prediction market contracts as wagering transactions.
tax.thomsonreuters.comtoproaccounting.comIf classified as gambling, traders can deduct only 90% of losses against winnings, potentially creating taxable income even when they break break economically.
greentradertax.comNote: The unresolved classification means taxpayers must currently report income regardless of the category, but the specific deduction limits depend entirely on future IRS guidance.
The New York Attorney General alleged that prediction market products tied to sports outcomes constitute illegal gambling under state law, highlighting regulatory pressure on the sector.
greentradertax.comAnalysis indicates Americans using prediction markets for World Cup bets may face a lighter tax burden than sportsbook users if courts treat payouts as financial instruments rather than gambling.
fortune.comThe IRS has not released any federal guidance on how to tax prediction market winnings or losses as 2026 tax filing continues.
CNBCAI-generated briefing. AI can make mistakes. This is not financial advice.
Non-precedential Chief Counsel Advice has treated daily fantasy sports entry fees as wagering transactions because they share the same structure of an uncertain event with a payout if resolved correctly.
toproaccounting.comRecent regulatory enforcement by the New York Attorney General specifically targeted sports and election-based prediction products as illegal gambling, suggesting a pattern of treating these contracts as wagers.
greentradertax.comThe IRS explicitly lists "sports betting" as gambling income under IRC § 61, and legal analysts note that the list is not exhaustive, leaving room to include sports event contracts.
toproaccounting.comAI-generated briefing. AI can make mistakes. This is not financial advice.
No revenue ruling, regulation, or IRS notice explicitly addresses prediction market event contracts by name, meaning all current characterizations are arguments from analogy rather than settled law.
toproaccounting.comPrediction platforms like Kalshi reject the gambling label and contend they offer futures contracts regulated by the CFTC, which could qualify for favorable Section 1256 mark-to-market treatment instead.
tax.thomsonreuters.comIf classified as capital assets rather than wagers, losses would not be subject to the Section 165(d) 90% cap and could potentially offset other capital gains without the gambling gains limitation.
AI-generated briefing. AI can make mistakes. This is not financial advice.
New signals coming soon
We're building signal widgets tailored to markets like this one. Please check back later.